Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 0:52:56 GMT -5
The TS indicates that it is still necessary for the worker to be defended by a lawye
The Supreme Court has allowed a social graduate to appear in that instance on behalf of a worker. According to the law, these professionals can represent workers before the courts in Fax Lists social courts and even before the superior courts of the autonomous communities. However, when a labor dispute reached the Supreme Court, the appellant must be defended by a lawyer. Unlike what has been published, the Supreme Court clarifies that this does not mean that defense by social graduates is allowed under conditions of equality with respect to a lawyer .
Economist & Jurist has been able to access the document, the content of which was advanced by the EFE Agency, in which the social graduate requested that she be considered a person in the procedure, pointing out that otherwise it would imply a violation of the constitutionally protected principle of equality . Remember that article 21 of the Law Regulating Social Jurisdiction limits the access of social graduates to the Supreme Court and that they have, in this matter, training perfectly comparable or even superior to that of most lawyers in this regard. .
Specifically, article 21 of the LRJS establishes that "defense by a lawyer and technical representation by a collegiate social graduate will be optional in the instance. In the appeal, the litigants must be defended by a lawyer or technically represented by a collegiate social graduate. In the appeal and in procedural proceedings before the Supreme Court, the defense of a lawyer will be mandatory.
The Supreme Court has allowed a social graduate to appear in that instance on behalf of a worker. According to the law, these professionals can represent workers before the courts in Fax Lists social courts and even before the superior courts of the autonomous communities. However, when a labor dispute reached the Supreme Court, the appellant must be defended by a lawyer. Unlike what has been published, the Supreme Court clarifies that this does not mean that defense by social graduates is allowed under conditions of equality with respect to a lawyer .
Economist & Jurist has been able to access the document, the content of which was advanced by the EFE Agency, in which the social graduate requested that she be considered a person in the procedure, pointing out that otherwise it would imply a violation of the constitutionally protected principle of equality . Remember that article 21 of the Law Regulating Social Jurisdiction limits the access of social graduates to the Supreme Court and that they have, in this matter, training perfectly comparable or even superior to that of most lawyers in this regard. .
Specifically, article 21 of the LRJS establishes that "defense by a lawyer and technical representation by a collegiate social graduate will be optional in the instance. In the appeal, the litigants must be defended by a lawyer or technically represented by a collegiate social graduate. In the appeal and in procedural proceedings before the Supreme Court, the defense of a lawyer will be mandatory.