Post by account_disabled on Mar 13, 2024 22:31:50 GMT -5
Once this administrative body contacted the CGAE, it indicated that it had responded on January 3 and that it had been indicated that “the CGAE lacks any competence in matters of professional fees and does not have a copy of the criteria.” guides of professional fees issued for cost assessments by the Bar Associations of the Government of Castilla y León. They urged the applicant to go to each of the community colleges , “as they are the only ones competent to issue said criteria.” The CGAE did not accompany its allegation with a notification proving that, in fact, it was sent .
The claimant insisted that the CGAE does have powers in relation to setting fees and emphasizes that there is a common text for all bar associations in Castilla y León, constantly cited by different judicial DJ USA bodies. Hence, the author of the text must be, he argued, the General Council itself or the Council of Lawyers of Castilla y León . He also alleged that article 19 of Law 19/2013 establishes that “if the request refers to information that is not in the possession of the subject to whom it is addressed, he or she will send it to the competent person, if known, and will inform of this. circumstance to the applicant.”
The law delimits the material scope of the right "from a broad concept of information, which covers both documents and specific content and extends to all types of format or support." It is required that the information be "in the possession" of one of the obligated subjects and that it has been prepared or obtained in the exercise of their functions.The Transparency Council recalls in its resolution that Law 2/1974 on Professional Associations establishes that associations may develop indicative criteria for the exclusive purposes of assessing costs and that these criteria will be equally valid for the calculation of fees and rights that correspond. for the purposes of assessing costs in free legal assistance. Hence it can be understood that it is up to the schools to create these criteria .
The claimant insisted that the CGAE does have powers in relation to setting fees and emphasizes that there is a common text for all bar associations in Castilla y León, constantly cited by different judicial DJ USA bodies. Hence, the author of the text must be, he argued, the General Council itself or the Council of Lawyers of Castilla y León . He also alleged that article 19 of Law 19/2013 establishes that “if the request refers to information that is not in the possession of the subject to whom it is addressed, he or she will send it to the competent person, if known, and will inform of this. circumstance to the applicant.”
The law delimits the material scope of the right "from a broad concept of information, which covers both documents and specific content and extends to all types of format or support." It is required that the information be "in the possession" of one of the obligated subjects and that it has been prepared or obtained in the exercise of their functions.The Transparency Council recalls in its resolution that Law 2/1974 on Professional Associations establishes that associations may develop indicative criteria for the exclusive purposes of assessing costs and that these criteria will be equally valid for the calculation of fees and rights that correspond. for the purposes of assessing costs in free legal assistance. Hence it can be understood that it is up to the schools to create these criteria .